Success Stories

Proof, Not Promises

Early-stage founders don't just need a vendor. They need a partner who can deliver under runway pressure. Below are examples of the kinds of outcomes we deliver when teams need to increase velocity without losing control.

Best for seed–Series B startups and PE-backed teams under delivery pressure.


The Outcomes We’re Hired For

Ship Faster

More production-ready output without expanding long-term headcount too early.

Unblock Sales

Close product gaps and integrations that are blocking enterprise deals.

Hit Milestones

Launch, deliver commitments, and show investor-visible progress on time.

Protect Runway

Flexible capacity you can scale up, shift, or pause as priorities change.


Success Stories

Seed-Stage AI Startup

Productizing Core IP Without Accelerating Burn

Early-stage startup Embedded engineers Burn-rate conscious

Problem

A seed-stage AI startup with a highly technical founding team had built a compelling proof of concept that attracted early adopter and investor interest. However, they lacked the engineering capacity to turn that proof of concept into a production-ready product. They were not ready to hire their first full-time engineering roles due to burn-rate concerns.

What we did

  • Embedded high-skilled engineers directly into the founding team's workflow (standups, Slack, code reviews, and release cycles).
  • Focused on rapid productization of the startup's core IP, prioritizing production readiness, reliability, and extensibility from day one.
  • Maintained tight alignment with the CEO as priorities evolved, ensuring engineering effort was always focused on the most immediate business needs.

Outcome

  • < 2 months from proof of concept to initial product launch
  • Day-one impact with engineers shipping production features immediately
  • High confidence in scalability with no near-term rearchitecture required
  • Low operational cost without committing to full-time headcount
"I'm amazed by how much we were able to accomplish in just a few weeks. This would have taken us several months otherwise. The engineers were shipping meaningful features on day one, and the quality has been outstanding. We're confident the platform is ready to scale without any near-term rearchitecture, all at an incredibly low operational cost."
— Adam W., CEO

Healthcare Startup

Increasing Velocity While Reducing Team Size

Investor confidence Team efficiency Vendor collaboration

Problem

A healthcare startup was working with an existing development vendor, but the engineering team had grown rapidly without a corresponding increase in delivery velocity. As spend increased, progress slowed, and the company's primary investor began raising concerns about execution and pace.

What we did

  • Embedded experienced engineers to partner with the internal team and existing vendor, focusing on high-impact delivery rather than headcount.
  • Helped rationalize team structure and ownership, reducing unnecessary complexity while improving clarity and accountability.
  • Focused on shipping patient- and user-centric functionality with a higher bar for quality and maintainability.

Outcome

  • 60% reduction in overall team size
  • Increased velocity despite significantly lower engineering spend
  • Higher quality releases with improved confidence from stakeholders
  • Renewed investor confidence and stronger positioning for future funding rounds
"It's clear this team not only understands our users, but also the needs of the patients we serve. That perspective shows up in every design and implementation decision they've made while building this product."
— Suresh V., VP of Engineering

Private Equity–Backed Healthcare Company

De-Risking the Platform While the Core Team Focused on Growth

Exit readiness Technical due diligence Architecture & reliability

Problem

A private equity–backed healthcare company had grown through multiple acquisitions, resulting in a portfolio of products with varying levels of technical debt and operational risk. With the PE firm targeting an exit in the next 12–18 months, the CTO was concerned about how the platform would fare under technical due diligence. At the same time, the core engineering team needed to stay fully focused on delivering roadmap commitments tied to revenue growth.

What we did

  • Conducted a targeted "pre–due diligence" technical review across multiple products to identify high-risk architectural and operational areas.
  • Prioritized remediation efforts based on impact and risk, avoiding unnecessary refactors that could disrupt the product roadmap.
  • Took ownership of focused re-architecture and stabilization initiatives, operating independently while maintaining transparent, ongoing communication with the CTO.

Outcome

  • Reduced technical risk ahead of formal due diligence
  • Improved platform stability across acquired products
  • Protected roadmap delivery by keeping the core team focused on growth initiatives
  • Stronger exit readiness with fewer unknowns for future buyers
"You have a deep understanding of architecture and operational excellence, while also being incredibly pragmatic about what will have the most impact without increasing risk to the rest of the roadmap. I trust that you can take projects and run with them, while providing constant and transparent communication throughout the process."
— Allan H., CTO

Want to Turn Pressure Into Progress?

Let's talk through your next 90 days

We'll help you decide what capacity you need, where it helps most, and how to onboard fast without losing control.

Book a Discovery Call